User talk:Wilfredor/Archive 11

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:Bon Noel Series (3111065187).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bon Noel Series (3111065187).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 11:39, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Caviar (4318572416).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Caviar (4318572416).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 11:40, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Charlotte Pallandt Sculpture (3026020464).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Charlotte Pallandt Sculpture (3026020464).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 11:41, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Che Designs (3111064011).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Che Designs (3111064011).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 11:54, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

File:BlueCross (4268256317).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:BlueCross (4268256317).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Azur Sky (4241684008).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Azur Sky (4241684008).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 09:21, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

File:BASE Painting (3111903134).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:BASE Painting (3111903134).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 09:26, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Constantin Brâncuşi Le Coq - Atelier Brancusi Paris.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 07:45, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Bus Stop (3864885230).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bus Stop (3864885230).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 09:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Asparagus Series (3047083060).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Asparagus Series (3047083060).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 09:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Wrapping Paper Designs London (3111065287).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Paris 2008 (2845852578).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Paris 2008 (2845852578).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Paris 2008 (2845854334).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Paris 2008 (2845854334).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:40, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Yves Klein Arman 1962 Musée national d'art moderne Paris.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Yves Klein Arman 1962 Musée national d'art moderne Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Pirate Rabbit (2864581387).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Pirate Rabbit (2864581387).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Sky (2865151317).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Sky (2865151317).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Divine Flower Blossom (3026020722).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Divine Flower Blossom (3026020722).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

File:0 zero (12041421074).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

File:0 zero (12041421074).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:54, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

@BrightRaven: Please desist with these badly worded deletion nominations that falsely state that the uploader is the artist. I suggest you take a break from pursuing The Photographer for a while. There are a lot of uploads of theirs from Flickr that need categorizing rather than deletion requests. --Fæ (talk) 16:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Some users seem to focus more on nominations for deletion, rather than categorized appropriately. --The Photographer (talk) 16:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

High resolution images

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Wilfredo. I just thought you might like to be the first to see a photo I uploaded tonight. It's similar to the Laon Cathedral photo you voted on earlier, but maybe more successful. The DoF problem is still there, but it's not so bad because for this image I used a 85mm lens (not 200mm), only the seats and the nearest pillars are out of focus, all the really interesting things in the church are in perfect focus. I'm very happy with the image, it's 180 megapixels (!!!) and super sharp. Maybe you'll see it on FPC soon. ;-) Diliff (talk) 01:06, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ahaetulla prasina, oriental whipsnake - Kaeng Krachan National Park.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ahaetulla prasina, oriental whipsnake - Kaeng Krachan National Park.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

File:"Juicy Dumplings" (15564979516).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:"Juicy Dumplings" (15564979516).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jonund (talk) 19:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Facing the sea (3049901060).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Facing the sea (3049901060).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Revent (talk) 01:39, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For your photographic contributions about São Paulo on Commons. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:48, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:All Saints Margaret Street Interior 2, London, UK - Diliff.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:All Saints Margaret Street Interior 2, London, UK - Diliff.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Belgium-6430B - Atomium (14141441443).jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Belgium-6430B - Atomium (14141441443).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taxelson (talk) 12:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Photo inquire

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Wilfredo. Thought I ask you if you'd help us out with some pictures of e-cig shops. I assume that Brazil has a similar trend and, depending the area you live in, there must be some e-cig shops/lounges/bars for you to hit for a (photo) shootout. If you're up to it please take a look at the discussion here to get an idea about what we're looking for. Thanks in front, either way, TMCk (talk) 23:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi @The Magnificent Clean-keeper: , I added another picture to article, let me know if it is ok for you. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 12:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Appreciated for your effort but the picture you uploaded (and it sure looks nicer) is not what we are looking for. Imagine a "Paneteria" from the inside where you can see the varieties of bread on display. Or a fruit store like this or this one. Even without any store sign one can see what it is. Now if we could get something similar for e-cigarettes that would be great. And since it seems there are no free images like that for e-cigs I thought maybe you don't mind looking around for such shops and take some pictures yourself. Imagen unas fotos del interior de una tienda o "vape-shop" tomado por Wilfredo. Seria fantástico si puedes! Tal cual, muchísimas gracias, TMCk (talk) 00:17, 27 June 2015 (UTC) (Rusty Spanish, I know!TMCk (talk) 00:17, 27 June 2015 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Gomin, Quebec, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Université Laval, Quebec Canada 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 22:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Ignace-de-Loyola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments6 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photographs of Église Saint-Thomas-d'Aquin, Québec, Canada 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière St-Ignace-de-Loyola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Please add the geo location. --XRay 06:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Ignace-de-Loyola 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Canada 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Charles-Borromée de Québec, Canada 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

COM:AN

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ বাংলা ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆） ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#Wilfredor. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:44, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

This concerned your series of defamatory edits at COM:AN. @A.Savin asked you in this pingless edit 'Who is this "narcissistic, xenophobic, anti-Brazilian user"?'. I would also like to know. Also, your archives 36-49 are redlinked. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:41, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Psyché ranimée par le baiser de l'Amour, Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:15, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainte Véronique - Lorenzo Costa - Musée du Louvre Peintures RF 1989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:32, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and successful New Year 2025!

-- Radomianin (talk) 20:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays and best wishes for 2025!

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Happy holidays
Wilfredor!
Merry christmas!
Best wishes for 2025!
-- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays,

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

and thanks to your contribution to Commons.

Happy Holydays and Happy New Year 2025!

Terragio67

Terragio67 (talk) 07:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

* Happy Holidays! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

RodRabelo7 (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy Holidays 2024/2025!

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

Merry Christmas
and a happy new year!
✴

Hello Wilfredo,
thank you so much for your great photos! I hope you will find luck, peace and happiness in the new year. All the best,
Aristeas (talk) 11:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

File:Mariusz (6224609395).jpg

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Mariusz (6224609395).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

IOIOI (talk) 14:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 10 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christ at the Column by Antonello da Messina (Louvre RF 1992-10) with frame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality --Tzim78 16:37, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontana di Trevi 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 13:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 10 months ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exterior of Neuschwanstein Castle 21 80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Gaius Flavius Valerius Constantinus, Palatino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Levis, Quebec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garofalo, madonna col bambino, 1512 ca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardin universitaire Roger-Van den Hende, Quebec, Canada 984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 9 months ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street lamps in National Assembly of Quebec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helen McNicoll, Exposition dans le Musée national des beaux-arts du Québec 11.tif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Very good picture, though I'd suggest using the "Art Photo" instead of "Description" template. --Plozessor 04:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helen McNicoll, Exposition dans le Musée national des beaux-arts du Québec 10.tif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Same here, very good picture, should use "Art Photo". --Plozessor 04:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quebec city in autumn 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paroisse Orthodoxe de la Sainte-Trinité de Québec 45444.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 20:10, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gelbe Treppe Königsbau Münchner Residenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 02:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Your most memorable shot of 2024

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2024? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2025. Warmly, --Ailura (talk) 18:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Bosque malintzi 1 (15954488053).jpg

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Bosque malintzi 1 (15954488053).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

$999$ REAL 💬 ⬆ 17:14, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

		The Barnstar of Peace
		for selfless editing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scène des massacres de Scio, Louvre room 700.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Signature

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, Wilfredor. I'm just letting you know that your signature on the de-adminship page for A.Savin isn't appearing correctly. I thought you might want to fix it. -- Auntof6 (talk) 17:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, but someone else had already fixed it. Wilfredor (talk) 17:47, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Hôtel Le Concorde in a Sunsets of Quebec City showing Colombian flag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:03, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chandelier in interior of Münchner Residenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour Saint-Jacques, Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buste de Didius Iulianus5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:53, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 9 months ago6 comments5 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17th Century Italian Candelabrum Influenced by Trajan's Column.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Circular staircase of the Vatican Museums 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 02:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuschwanstein Castle 33 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Picture is good but description is wrong, apparently it does not show the castle but a view from the castle. Please fix that (would be good to know from which room and where to the view is etc.). --Plozessor 04:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Done Thanks --Wilfredor 01:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Support Thx! Good! --Plozessor 08:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cour Marly, Musée du Louvre from Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:27, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corso del Rinascimento (Rome) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mona Lisa in the Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nike of Samothrace from Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 9 months ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galerie d'Apollon (Louvre).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare d'Auber.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient Egypt. Mummy of woman from Thebes. 1070-945 BC. Vatican Museums.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 07:45, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Detail of Mulher do chale verde by Cyprien Eugene Boulet.jpg

Yours sincerely, Prosfilaes (talk) 23:51, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte Marguerite-de-Navarre (Paris) station Black and White.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 22:46, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in quebec city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:56, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Tresor, vieux Quebec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Face of Urban Exhaustion- End of Day in São Paulo's Metro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:48, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nike of Samothrace, Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:16, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atala au tombeau - Anne-Louis Girodet - Musée du Louvre Peintures INV 4958, louvre 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:06, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venus de Milo from Paris Project, 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:06, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Convite para participar do Wiki Loves Cultura Popular Brasil 2025!

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Saudações, @Wilfredor

Como você participou de um ou mais concursos fotográficos no passado, estou enviando esta mensagem para te convidar para participar da edição de 2025 do Wiki Loves Cultura Popular Brasil, um concurso fotográfico que valoriza o patrimônio imaterial brasileiro!

Como você pode participar?

Visite a página do concurso na Wikipédia e navegue pelas listas de elementos culturais brasileiros, que estão divididos em seis categorias:

Envie suas fotografias e você estará participando automaticamente do concurso!

Premiação

As melhores fotos, vídeos e áudios concorrem a prêmios em cada categoria, além de uma premiação especial para a melhor foto do Maranhão e também para a melhor mídia geral, cujo(a) fotógrafo(a) receberá uma bolsa para participar da WikiCon Brasil 2025, em Salvador. Além disso, as imagens do concurso nacional concorrem a diversos prêmios na etapa internacional.

Qualquer dúvida que você tiver, por favor me envie uma mensagem.

Novamente, muito obrigado pela sua participação nos concursos anteriores, estou ansioso por ver mais fotografias suas esse ano! EPorto (WMB) (talk) 22:46, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago14 comments6 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Public telephone on Saint Jean Avenue in downtown Quebec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:04, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grace Ngambo singing in Evangel Pentecostal Church, Quebec City (B & W).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avenue Cartier, Quebec ville, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio de Janeiro city from Pão de Açúcar, Brazil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atala au tombeau - Anne-Louis Girodet - Musée du Louvre Peintures INV 4958, louvre 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:06, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venus de Milo from Paris Project, 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:06, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1958 Ford Custom 300 in D'Youville, Quebec city, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
No information besides that it's in the old town of Quebec? Where exactly? Who and what is this? What about personality rights? --Plozessor 04:57, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
Done Thanks --Wilfredor 14:32, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
Done Thanks --Wilfredor 14:33, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Thx, ok now! --Plozessor 05:58, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice picture, but needs some mention about personality rights. --Kallerna 07:38, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Done Thanks --Wilfredor 23:29, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks, good for me now! --Kallerna 17:04, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago5 comments5 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Vierge et l'Enfant - Barnaba da Modena - Musée du Louvre Peintures RF 1968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:30, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --দিব্য দত্ত 19:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Sacrement, Quebec city in winter, after a snow storm 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:02, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte Marguerite-de-Navarre (Paris) station Black and White.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 00:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altar de oración en la sede de la ONU durante la huelga de hambre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clinique De Physiothérapie Pcn Saint-sacrement.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 20:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago5 comments5 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Île d'Orléans 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:49, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Île d'Orléans 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dying slave Louvre MR 1590, Louvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Matej Frančeškin 20:36, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vierge de l'Annonciation, Tilman Riemenschneider, vers 1495-1500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:33, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igreja de Santo António em Río de Janeiro, Brasil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Copacabana Palace, Rio de Janeiro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago8 comments5 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praça Mauá, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It's leaning out at the right. --XRay 04:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
I checked the verticals several times and I cant see it. Could you add notes? --Wilfredor 09:50, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Support I can't find them again, but I've seen your fixes. --XRay 12:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dining room at the inn Dans les bras de Morphée, located on Île d'Orléans.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 16:18, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Île d'Orléans 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The right part of the stable is badly out of focus, not sure if it would make sense to crop it more tightly. But in any case, there are a few dust spots in the sky (a bigger one in the right part and a small one near the middle, probably more). --Plozessor 04:49, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Done Thanks --Wilfredor 14:23, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Ok now! --Plozessor 14:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset in Píer Oscar Weinschenck, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 20:26, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demonstration of Venezuelans in Quebec against the dictatorship in Venezuela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:55, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hydrochoeris hydrochaeris in Brazil in Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 003 version 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:31, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio de Janeiro Favela, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Clube Federal from Condomínio do Edifício Zaher, Le Blond, Rio de Janeiro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 128 Rue Saint-Saëns, 75015 Paris, França, Black and White.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 20:50, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio de Janeiro, Brazil -21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 10:16, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio de Janeiro, Brazil -08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 10:16, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It's leaning out. --XRay 04:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Done Thank --Wilfredor 23:12, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Thank you. --XRay 05:58, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 months ago6 comments5 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Militar Police of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sugarloaf Mountain, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:01, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tempête à Québec, 02-13-2025 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMO still abit too much color noise IMO --MB-one 09:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Done Thanks --Wilfredor 14:31, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --MB-one 23:06, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 28 February 2025 (UTC)